FLOOR SESSION AGENDA - Regular Session: 10:00 a.m.
Agendas
ASSEMBLY BILLS—SECOND READING FILE
GOVERNOR’S APPOINTMENTS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS –
SB 757, as it passed the Senate, authorized, until January 1, 2035, the legislative body of a city or county to collect fines for specified violations related to nuisance abatement using a nuisance abatement lien or a special assessment and required those fines and penalties to be used for specified housing purposes relating to supporting local enforcement of state and local building and fire code standards.
The Assembly amendments instead require those fines and penalties to be used to fund efforts within city or county government, as applicable, to streamline the issuance of permits for housing development or to establish a revolving loan fund for specified housing purposes.
SB 757, as it passed the Senate, required the city or county to create a process for granting a hardship waiver to reduce the amount of the above-described fine upon a specified showing by the responsible person. SB 757, as it passed the Senate, also required the enforcing entity to provide 30 days, as specified, to a person responsible for a continuing violation to correct or remedy the violation prior to the imposition of penalties, except as provided.
The Assembly amendments also require the hardship waiver to totally waive fines and penalties for persons with income equal to or less than 200% of the federal poverty line and require the enforcing entity to provide 60 days to correct or remedy continuing violations.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2025Jul. 14In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.37S.B.No. 9 —Arreguín et al.An act relating to land use.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 9, as it passed the Senate, invalidated a local agency accessory dwelling unit ordinance if the local agency fails to submit a copy of the ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days of adoption or fails to respond to the department’s findings that the ordinance does not comply with certain standards within 30 days.
The Assembly amendments move this provision to a different Government Code section and additionally specify that certain submittal requirements are included in the standards for which the department determines compliance.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—28.NOES—4.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.38S.B.No. 87 —Seyarto et al.An act relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 87, as it passed the Senate, deleted the sunset of a provision that made, until January 1, 2026, for the purpose of Sales and Use Tax Law, an all-volunteer fire department, as defined, a consumer and not a retailer if the profits are used solely and exclusively in furtherance of the purposes of the all-volunteer fire department, as prescribed.
The Assembly amendments instead extend the sunset until January 1, 2031.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.39S.B.No. 227 —Grayson et al.An act relating to local government, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 227, as it passed the Senate, among other things, made changes to the membership of the board of directors of the Green Empowerment Zone for the Northern Waterfront area of the County of Contra Costa.
The Assembly amendments, in addition to those changes, remove the director representing the State Air Resources Board from the board of directors. The Assembly amendments also revise the term limits for the chair and deputy directors of the board by eliminating the prohibition against serving consecutive terms and, instead, authorizing the chair and deputy directors to be re-selected by a majority vote of the board for up to 3 additional terms.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.40S.B.No. 272 —Becker et al.An act relating to public contracts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 272, as it passed the Senate, established a pilot program authorizing the San Mateo County Transit District to use job order contracting as a procurement method, as specified.
The Assembly amendments add coauthors.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.41S.B.No. 276 —Wiener et al.An act relating to local government, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 276, as it passed the Senate, among other things, authorized an ordinance adopted by the City and County of San Francisco to provide specified punishments for selling merchandise without a permit, including that 2nd and 3rd violations would be punishable as infractions, and that subsequent violations after 2 prior convictions would be punishable as infractions or misdemeanors.
The Assembly amendments, instead, authorize an ordinance as described above to make 2nd and 3rd violations within 18 months of the first violation punishable as infractions, and subsequent violations after 3 prior violations that occur within 18 months of the first violation punishable as infractions or misdemeanors.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.42S.B.No. 281 —Pérez et al.An act relating to criminal procedure.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 281, as it passed the Senate, required the court to give verbatim a specified advisement related to citizenship status prior to acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a crime and clarified that advisement to state that if the defendant is not a citizen of the United States, conviction may result in certain immigration consequences.
The Assembly amendments clarify that it is not the intent of the Legislature that a court’s failure to provide the advisement verbatim to a plea accepted prior to January 1, 2026, requires vacation of the judgment and withdrawal of the plea.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—28.NOES—10.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.43S.B.No. 301 —Grayson.An act relating to retirement.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 301, as it passed the Senate, prohibited, beginning on or after January 1, 2026, a city or district that contracts with a retirement system under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) from amending their contract with the system in a a manner that provides for the exclusion of some, but not all, employees.
The Assembly amendments instead prohibit a county or district whose officers and employees are enrolled as members of a retirement system under CERL from excluding from membership in the system any employee, group, or classification, other than those excludable officer and employees, as defined. The Assembly amendments include findings that changes proposed by the bill address a matter of statewide concern and that its provisions are declaratory of existing law.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—1.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.44S.B.No. 390 —Becker et al.An act relating to local government.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 390, as it passed the Senate, provided an exception to the prohibition against including or annexing a territory that is dedicated or restricted to agricultural, open-space, or conservation uses to a community facilities district, as specified, without the landowner’s consent. SB 390, as it passed the Senate, provided that for territory that is located within the regional shoreline of the County of San Mateo, the consent of a landowner is not required, if specified conditions are met.
The Assembly amendments make a nonsubstantive change and add coauthors.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.45S.B.No. 412 —Limón et al.An act relating to public health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 412, as it passed the Senate, required a home care organization to ensure that an affiliated home care aide completed, prior to providing home care and annually thereafter, training related to the special care needs of clients with dementia.
The Assembly amendments delay the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2027.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—36.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.46S.B.No. 447 —Umberg et al.An act relating to workers' compensation.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 447, as it passed the Senate, extended the requirement for an employer of a local firefighter or peace officer who is killed or dies as a result of accident or injury caused by external violence of physical force incurred in the performance of their duty to provide health benefits to the deceased employee’s minor dependents until the minor dependents reach 26 years of age.
The Assembly amendments make a technical, nonsubstantive change to those provisions and add a coauthor.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.47S.B.No. 480 —Archuleta.An act relating to autonomous vehicles.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 480, as it passed the Senate, authorized an autonomous vehicle to be equipped with automated driving system (ADS) marker lamps in accordance with specified standards. For purposes of this provision, the bill would define an “ADS marker lamp” as a device that emits a light to indicate when an ADS is engaged in the operation of the vehicle.
The Assembly amendments make conforming changes to existing vehicle equipment requirements.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.48S.B.No. 506 —Committee on Transportation (Senators Cortese (Chair)) et al.An act relating to transportation.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 506, as it passed the Senate, amended various provisions that, taken together, constitute a transportation omnibus bill.
The Assembly amendments make a change to the composition of the Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority’s governing board, amend certain provisions of the Treasure Island Transportation Management Act to remove the San Francisco County Transportation Authority from involvement with congestion pricing for Treasure Island, and revise a prohibition of driving a motor vehicle with any object or material placed upon the windshield or side or rear windows to exempt specified vehicle technology.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.49S.B.No. 507 —Limón.An act relating to housing.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 507, as it passed the Senate, authorized a local government within the same county as a tribe to enter into a voluntary agreement with a tribe to allow new tribal housing development projects to count toward the locality’s share of the regional housing needs allocation, as specified.
The Assembly amendments specify that the bill’s provisions do not affect an existing tribal housing development that is being counted towards a locality’s share of the regional housing needs allocation regardless of whether a local government and a tribe enter into a voluntary agreement, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.50S.B.No. 626 —Smallwood-Cuevas et al.An act relating to perinatal health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 626, as it passed the Senate, required a licensed health care practitioner who provides perinatal care for a patient to diagnose and treat the patient for a perinatal mental health condition in accordance with applicable clinical guidelines, as specified, or standards appropriate to the provider’s license, training, and scope of practice.
The Assembly amendments remove the requirement that a licensed health care practitioner diagnose and treat the patient or client for a perinatal mental health condition in accordance with specified clinical guidelines. The Assembly amendments require a specified licensed health care practitioner to ensure that a patient or client is offered screening or is appropriately screened for perinatal mental health conditions consistent with the perinatal mental health program. The Assembly amendments authorize a licensed health care practitioner to satisfy this requirement by referring the patient or client to another licensed health care practitioner who is authorized to screen, diagnose, and treat the patient or client for a perinatal mental health condition.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.51S.B.No. 650 —Cabaldon.An act relating to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 650, as it passed the Senate, made the provisions of the Delta Plan severable and provided certain deadlines for legal actions arising out of specified actions of the Delta Stewardship Council, among other changes.
The Assembly amendments provide that it is the intent of the Legislature that Delta Stewardship Council appointees have knowledge about the Delta.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—34.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.52S.B.No. 686 —Reyes et al.An act relating to housing.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 686, as it passed the Senate, revised and recast various provisions relating to housing financing and development, including authorizing the Department of Housing and Community Development to approve the payoff of a department loan in whole or part before the end of its term and to waive specified requirements in prescribed regulatory agreements, as provided. SB 686, as it passed the Senate, also defined a term for those purposes as well as the No Place Like Home Program.
The Assembly amendments delete those provisions and, instead, require the department to allow property owners subject to a regulatory agreement with the department to take out additional debt on the development if any extracted equity, as defined, is utilized for specified purposes.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.53S.B.No. 731 —Archuleta.An act relating to public safety.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 731, as it passed the Senate, expanded an existing exemption for certain trash and storage containers on a roadway or the curb of a roadway from a requirement to have 8 strips of fluorescent yellow reflective tape that meets specified requirements for material and spacing, if the container had reflectors applied before January 1, 2025.
The Assembly amendments would, if the container is not exempt from the requirement for 8 strips of fluorescent yellow reflective tape, require the reflective tape for a storage container transported by truck and trailer to be fluorescent yellow, red, white, or alternating red and white, and meet specified requirements for material and spacing.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.54S.B.No. 764 —Weber Pierson et al.An act relating to children's health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 764, as it passed the Senate, required a chain restaurant that sells a children’s meal to offer at least one children’s meal that meets specified minimum nutrition standards and to train employees on how to comply with those requirements. SB 764, as it passed the Senate, also imposed additional duties on local enforcement agencies by requiring the agencies to provide written notice, on or before April 1, 2026, to specified chain restaurants that sell children’s meals, that they are required to offer children’s meals that meet specified nutrition standards and are required to train employees on how to comply with those requirements.
The Assembly amendments remove the additional duties on local enforcement agencies. The Assembly amendments also remove the training requirements for employees and instead require chain restaurants to include information to its employees during training on how to comply with the requirements mentioned above. The Assembly amendments also require a chain restaurant to include an icon or symbol on the menu to identify the children’s meal that meets the specified nutrition standards.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.55S.B.No. 857 —Committee on Public Safety (Senators Arreguín (Chair)) et al.An act relating to public safety.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 857, as it passed the Senate, amended various provisions that, taken together, constitute the public safety omnibus bill.
The Assembly amendments remove a provision making technical amendments regarding restitution fines and add a provision providing that any conflicting bills shall prevail over this bill, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—34.NOES—0.)2025Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.56S.J.R.No. 9 —Durazo et al.Relative to immigration raids.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—29.NOES—6.)2025Sep. 2In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.




