FLOOR SESSION AGENDA - Regular Session: 10:00 a.m.
Agendas
ASSEMBLY BILLS—SECOND READING FILE
GOVERNOR’S VETOES
To the Members of the California State Senate:
I am returning Senate Bill 301 without my signature.
This bill would require the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to establish the Zero-Emission Aftermarket Conversion Project (ZACP) to provide an applicant with a financial rebate for converting a gasoline- or diesel-fueled vehicle into a zero-emission vehicle (ZEV).
California is showing the world what's possible - fostering innovation and creating space for an industry to flourish as the sale of ZEVs reach record highs, with over 1.8 million ZEVs now on California's roads. The state continues to invest billions of dollars in ZEV deployment and supporting infrastructure to achieve our ambitious climate and clean air goals.
While I share the author's desire to further accelerate the state's transition to ZEVs, this bill creates a new program at a time when the state faces a $44.9 billion shortfall for the 2024-25 fiscal year. Additionally, there is no funding currently identified or available in the state budget to support this new program.
For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.
Sincerely,
Gavin Newsom
2024Jun. 14Shall Senate Bill 301 become a law notwithstanding the objections of the Governor? (Must be considered pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.)
4S.B.No. 674 —Gonzalez et al.An act relating to air pollution.Vote required: 27To the Members of the California State Senate:
I am returning Senate Bill 674 without my signature.
This bill would make several changes to the refinery fence-line air monitoring program, including expanding the program to include monitoring for biofuel refineries and additional pollutants, applying the program to contiguous or adjacent refinery-related facilities, increasing the standards for data quality, and providing new processes for notifying local communities.
California has some of the most stringent refinery air monitoring and pollution standards in the world. These standards have been developed and implemented by the state's local air quality management districts, and each of these districts possess the authority and technical expertise to update, expand and modify these standards according to the best available science.
While I share the author's desire to protect communities from air pollution, local air quality management districts are already carrying out the necessary action to do just that. Additionally, because this bill mandates these districts to implement highly prescriptive measures, it might be found to require state reimbursement of implementation costs at a time when we just recently closed a $44.9 billion shortfall for the 2024-25 fiscal year. There is no state funding identified or available in the state budget to support these efforts.
For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.
Sincerely,
Gavin Newsom
2024Aug. 19Shall Senate Bill 674 become a law notwithstanding the objections of the Governor? (Must be considered pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.)UNFINISHED BUSINESS –
SB 268, as it passed the Senate, included the crime of rape of an intoxicated person wherein the defendant drugged the victim, as a “violent felony” for the purposes of provisions related to sentencing enhancements for prior convictions and other provisions of the Penal Code.
The Assembly amendments add coauthors and make a technical, nonsubstantive change.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.6S.J.R.No. 16 —Padilla et al.Relative to the Chuckwalla National Monument, the Joshua Tree National Monument, and the Kw'tsán National Monument.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—34.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.7S.J.R.No. 17 —Allen et al.Relative to the Sáttítla National Monument.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.8S.B.No. 1432 —Caballero et al.An act relating to health facilities.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1432, as it passed the Senate, extended the seismic compliance deadline imposed by the Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983, from January 1, 2030, to January 1, 2033, for a hospital building for which the hospital owner submitted a seismic compliance plan, a specified evaluation report, and an attestation, as specified. SB 1432, as it passed the Senate, authorized a hospital to propose a final compliance date that extended up to 5 years beyond January 1, 2033, but no later than January 1, 2038, as specified. SB 1432, as it passed the Senate, required the hospital and the department to identify at least 2 major milestones relating to the seismic compliance plan, as specified. SB 1432, as it passed the Senate, required an acute care inpatient hospital with one or more specified hospital buildings to submit a Patient Alternate Care Sites and Transfer Plan to the department, as specified, required the department, in consultation with the California Health Facilities Financing Authority, to submit a specified report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2028, and required the department, among other things, to convene a stakeholder workgroup on or before January 1, 2028, to facilitate input, as specified.
The Assembly amendments make the provisions applicable to operators as well as owners. The Assembly amendments instead authorize a hospital owner or operator to submit an application to the Department of Health Care Access and Information for an extension of the January 1, 2030, seismic compliance deadline by up to 5 years, but no later than January 1, 2035, for a hospital that submits the items specified above and, in addition, submits a financial plan, as specified. The Assembly amendments authorize the department, before acting on the application, to require the hospital owner or operator to meet and confer regarding any item in the application, as specified. The Assembly amendments instead require the department to identify at least 2 milestones, and the hospital to identify the corresponding financing sources, as specified. The Assembly amendments authorize the department to impose a fine of up to $5,000 per calendar day per hospital for the hospital’s failure to meet any agreed upon milestones until the milestones are met. The Assembly amendments remove the requirements mentioned above for acute care inpatient hospitals, the specified reporting, and the stakeholder group.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.9S.B.No. 1454 —Ashby et al.An act relating to professions and vocations.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1454, as it passed the Senate, among other things, expanded the definition of “person” under the Private Security Services Act to include a federally recognized tribe and prescribed additional requirements for licensure for tribal applicants. SB 1454 also excluded federally recognized tribes or security persons employed by a federally recognized tribe from the requirements of the Proprietary Security Services Act. SB 1454 additionally extended the authorization for a limited liability company to become licensed by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services as a private investigator or alarm company operator until January 1, 2030.
The Assembly amendments, among other things, expand the definition of “person” under the PSSA to include a participating tribe, defined to mean a federally recognized tribe that formally applies for licensure from the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services, and revise the exclusion under the Proprietary Security Services Act to exclude a federally recognized tribe that has one or more employees who provide unarmed security services only for that tribe and an unarmed individual employed by a federally recognized tribe to provide security services only for that tribe. The Assembly amendments remove the extension of the authorization for a limited liability company to become licensed by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services as a private investigator or alarm company operator. The Assembly amendments also revise and recast various provisions under the Collateral Recovery Act, the Private Investigator Act, and the Alarm Company Act.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.10S.B.No. 1266 —Limón.An act relating to product safety.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1266, as it passed the Senate, applied the existing prohibition on the manufacture, sale, or distribution in commerce of any bottle or cup that contains bisphenol A, if the bottle or cup is designed or intended to be filled with any liquid, food, or beverage intended primarily for consumption by children 3 years of age or younger, instead to any juvenile’s feeding, sucking, or teething product that contains any form of bisphenol at a detectable level above 0.1 parts per billion.
The Assembly amendments instead apply the above prohibition to products that contain any form of bisphenol above the practical quantitation limit as determined by the department, and authorize the department or the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition above.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 28Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.Aug. 29From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)11S.B.No. 299 —Limón et al.An act relating to voting.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 299, as it passed the Senate, removed loss of contact with a beneficiary, as evidenced by the return of mail, as a circumstance requiring prompt redetermination of a Medi-Cal beneficiary’s eligibility to receive Medi-Cal benefits.
The Assembly amendments instead require the Secretary of State and the Department of Motor Vehicles to develop a process for the department to use information from the statewide voter registration database to determine whether a person who submits to a driver’s license application is already registered or preregistered to vote in the state. The Assembly amendments would require the department to transmit specified information provided by the person during their transaction with the department to the Secretary of State for the purpose of registering or preregistering the person to vote or to update their registration information. The Assembly amendments would make these provisions operative on the earlier of January 1, 2030, or 5 days after the Secretary of State and the department certify that the information technology infrastructure necessary to substantially implement the bill is functional.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—36.NOES—1.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 28Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.Aug. 29From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.)12S.B.No. 707 —Newman et al.An act relating to solid waste.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—8.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 28Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.Aug. 29From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.)13S.B.No. 1143 —Allen.An act relating to paint products.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1143, as it passed the Senate, established the Household Hazardous Waste Producer Responsibility Act of 2024, which created a producer responsibility program for products containing household hazardous waste.
The Assembly amendments instead recast the architectural paint recovery program as the paint product recovery program, which expands the scope of the stewardship program from architectural paint to paint products.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—30.NOES—7.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 29Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.)14S.B.No. 537 —Becker et al.An act relating to memorials.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 537, as it passed the Senate, authorized specified legislative bodies to use alternate teleconferencing provisions under the Ralph M. Brown Act until January 1, 2028, if certain requirements were met. SB 537, as it passed the Senate, also expanded the circumstances that would allow a member of a legislative body to participate in a meeting remotely. SB 537, as it passed the Senate, declared the bill as taking effect immediately as an urgency statute.
The Assembly amendments delete the contents of the bill and, instead, authorize a nonprofit organization representing Mexican Americans or Mexican immigrants to enter into negotiations with the Department of General Services, as provided, and other state agencies as applicable, to plan, construct, and maintain a memorial in an appropriate public place in the City or County of Los Angeles dedicated to Mexican Americans and Mexican immigrants who were forcibly deported from the United States during the Great Depression.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—8.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 28Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on G.O.Aug. 29From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.)15S.B.No. 918 —Umberg et al.An act relating to social media platforms.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 918, as it passed the Senate, required a social media platform to, at all times, make available by telephone to a law enforcement agency a law enforcement liaison for the purpose of receiving, and responding to, requests for information and, except as prescribed, required a social media platform to immediately comply with a search warrant provided to the social media platform by a law enforcement agency if the subject of the search warrant is an account on the social media platform owned by a user of the social media platform.
The Assembly amendments require, beginning July 1, 2025, a social media platform to maintain a law enforcement contact process that, among other things, makes available a staffed hotline for law enforcement personnel for purposes of receiving, and responding to, requests for information. The Assembly amendments, except as prescribed, require a social media platform to comply with a search warrant within 72 hours if the search warrant is provided to the social media platform by a law enforcement agency and the subject of the search warrant is information associated with an account on the social media platform and that information is controlled by a user of the social media platform.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 29Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB S. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)SENATE BILLS—THIRD READING FILE
ASSEMBLY BILLS—THIRD READING FILE
SPECIAL CONSENT CALENDAR #47
SPECIAL CONSENT CALENDAR #49
SB 536, as it passed the Senate, exempted specified races from a certain limitation relating to the number of thoroughbred races imported by thoroughbred racing associations or fairs.
The Assembly amendments instead authorize the Director of General Services to sell or lease property, of an unspecified acreage, known as the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Heman G. Stark Youth Correctional Facility, located in the City of Chino, in the County of San Bernardino, to the City of Chino at fair market value upon terms and conditions the director determines are in the best interests of the state, as specified.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on G.O.Aug. 28Set for hearing August 28.Aug. 28From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.)145S.B.No. 632 —Caballero et al.An act relating to vehicles.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 632, as it passed the Senate, allowed a candidate running for United States Representative or State Senate or Assembly in a multicounty district to submit their candidate statement to the Secretary of State for review and approval based on the statement’s conformance with state law, as specified. SB 632, as it passed the Senate, required the county elections official to accept the statement and prohibited requiring any modification to the approved language if the candidate received the approval of the Secretary of State.
The Assembly amendments delete those provisions, and, instead, authorize the Department of Parks and Recreation to implement a pilot project to designate combined-use highways on roads in Red Rock Canyon State Park to provide a unified system of trails for off-highway motor vehicles, among other purposes, as specified. The Assembly amendments also require the department, in conjunction with specified state agencies, to prepare and submit reports to the Legislature evaluating the effectiveness and environmental impacts of the pilot project, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 26Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).Aug. 26From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.Aug. 28Set for hearing August 28.Aug. 28From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)146S.B.No. 393 —Glazer et al.An act relating to civil actions.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 393, as it passed the Senate, authorized a defendant, in an action brought pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act relating to a housing development project, to file a motion requesting the plaintiff or petitioner to identify every person or entity that contributes more than $10,000, as specified, toward the plaintiff’s or petitioner’s costs of the action. The bill authorized the plaintiff or petitioner to request the court’s permission to withhold the public disclosure of a person or entity who made a monetary contribution, and prohibited those disclosures from being admitted into evidence for any purpose. The bill also prohibited an action or proceeding from being brought in the court to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul an act of a public agency for housing projects included in a master environmental impact report or other plan or project already approved following the completion of an environmental review, on grounds of noncompliance with the requirements of the act, as specified.
The Assembly amendments strike the provisions above, and instead modify the grounds that a defendant, in an action brought by a plaintiff to challenge a housing development project that meets or exceeds the requirements for low- or moderate-income housing, must assert when bringing a motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to furnish an undertaking as security for costs and damages that the defendant may occur as a result of a delay in carrying out the development project. The Assembly amendments require a defendant to bring this motion on the grounds that the action is without merit and was brought in bad faith, vexatiously, for the purpose of delay, or to thwart the low- or moderate-income nature of the housing development project. The Assembly amendments remove the requirement that a defendant bringing this motion must show that the plaintiff will not suffer under economic hardship by filing the undertaking, and instead permit the plaintiff to seek to limit the amount of the undertaking by presenting admissible evidence that filing the undertaking will cause the plaintiff to suffer undue economic hardship. The Assembly amendments authorize the court to decline to impose a bond on the plaintiff if the court determines that, based on admissible evidence presented by the plaintiff, the bond would cause the plaintiff to suffer undue economic hardship.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.Aug. 28Set for hearing August 28.Aug. 28From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.)147S.B.No. 551 —Portantino.An act relating to beverage containers, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 551, as it passed the Senate, specified new criteria and qualifications for members of county mental health boards.
The Assembly amendments instead authorize certain beverage manufacturers to submit a consolidated report to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery regarding the types of plastics used in their beverage containers instead of submitting individual reports. The Senate amendments also declare the bill as taking effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 26Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).Aug. 26From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.Aug. 28Set for hearing August 28.Aug. 28From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)148S.B.No. 1447 —Durazo et al.An act relating to hospitals.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1447, as it passed the Senate, extended the seismic compliance deadline imposed by the Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983, from January 1, 2030, to January 1, 2033, for the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles. SB 1447, as it passed the Senate, authorized an extension process for an additional 5 years, to no later than January 1, 2038, with the submission of a seismic compliance plan submitted no later than January 1, 2026, and a demonstration by the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles that, among other things, the hospital owner demonstrates a lack of financial capacity to substantially comply. SB 1447, as it passed the Senate, required the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, as a condition of approval, to submit to the Department of Health Care Access and Information, among other things, the hospital building plans and construction timeline, as specified.
The Assembly amendments instead authorize the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles to seek an extension to the January 1, 2030, seismic compliance deadline by up to 3 years, to no later than January 1, 2033, with the submission and department approval of a seismic compliance plan and evaluation report, as specified. The Assembly amendments authorize the department to authorize the extension as necessary if the hospital experiences issues with contractor, labor, or material delays, acts of God, governmental entitlements, or with other circumstances beyond the hospital’s control that prevent it from meeting the January 1, 2030, deadline. The Assembly amendments require the department to approve or deny the hospital’s seismic compliance plan and any extension to the seismic compliance deadline within 120 days, and require the seismic compliance plan to outlines steps, including milestones, to achieve compliance with seismic safety standards. The Assembly amendments impose a fine of $5,000 per calendar day for the hospital’s failure to comply with, among other things, a major milestone established by the department until the milestones are met. The Assembly amendments require the department to adopt regulations and standards to implement these provisions, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.149S.B.No. 379 —Umberg.An act relating to victim services.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 379, as it passed the Senate, required the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to establish an Accountability Letter Bank program, with the goal of providing an opportunity for incarcerated persons under the jurisdiction of the department to be accountable for the harm they have caused and to express remorse to those they have harmed.
The Assembly amendments additionally require the department to establish and maintain a Victim Offender Dialogue program, with the goal of providing voluntary opportunities for restorative justice processes between victims, survivors, and next of kin and people who are incarcerated or on parole.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.150S.B.No. 504 —Dodd.An act relating to fire prevention.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 504, as it passed the Senate, required the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, when reviewing applications for the local assistance grant program for fire prevention and home hardening activities, to give priority to any local governmental entity that is qualified to perform defensible space assessments in very high and high fire hazard severity zones who reports that information using the common reporting platform, as provided. SB 504, as it passed the Senate, required fuels to be maintained and spaced in a condition so that a wildfire would be unlikely to ignite the structure.
The Assembly amendments authorize, for purposes of the public education and outreach programs that are eligible under the above-mentioned grant program, new technologies and game elements to enhance and accelerate the education of property owners. The Assembly amendments, among other things, authorize regulations adopted by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to alter the fuel reduction required between 5 and 30 feet from around a structure, as specified, and provide that the requirement for the ember-resistant zone shall instead take effect for existing structures 3 years after the effective date for new structures, as specified. The Assembly amendments also include chaptering out provisions, as provided.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.151S.B.No. 571 —Allen et al.An act relating to fire safety.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 571, as it passed the Senate, required the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to create and provide to the Legislature a report relating to standards for ingress and egress routes in new development, as defined, proposed to be constructed in high and very high fire hazard severity zones, as provided. SB 571, as it passed the Senate, also required the state board to do certain things when creating the report, including provide opportunities for input from the public, as specified, and prohibited the state board from adopting any regulations incorporating the standards described in the report until at least 6 months after completing that report.
The Assembly amendments, instead, require the Office of Planning and Research to conduct a study and prepare a report that evaluates potential improvements to state standards for ingress and egress and evacuation routes for development in the event of a natural disaster, as specified. The Assembly amendments require the office to submit the report to the appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature, and the Governor, on or before January 1, 2027. The Assembly amendments also require the office, for purposes of assisting with and informing the development of the report, to convene and consult with a working group that includes specified voluntary representatives.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—31.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.152S.B.No. 892 —Padilla et al.An act relating to public contracts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 892, as it passed the Senate, required the Department of Technology to develop and adopt regulations to create an artificial intelligence (AI) risk management standard, consistent with specified publications regarding AI risk management. SB 892, as it passed the Senate, required the AI risk management standard to include, among other things, a detailed risk assessment procedure for procuring automated decision systems (ADS), as defined, that analyzes specified characteristics of the ADS, methods for appropriate risk controls, as provided, and adverse incident monitoring procedures. SB 892, as it passed the Senate, required the department to collaborate with specified organizations to develop the AI risk management standard. SB 892, as it passed the Senate, prohibited, commencing 6 months after the date on which regulations are approved and final, a state agency from entering into a contract for an ADS, or any service that utilizes an ADS, unless the contract includes a clause that, among other things, provides a completed risk assessment of the relevant ADS, requires adherence to appropriate risk controls, and provides procedures for adverse incident monitoring.
The Assembly amendments instead require the department to develop and adopt regulations to create an ADS procurement standard and require the department to consider principles and industry standards addressed in specified publications regarding AI risk management in developing those standards. The Assembly amendments additionally require the ADS procurement standard to include, among other things, a detailed equity assessment, as specified, an assessment that analyzes the level of human oversight associated with the use of ADS, and adherence to data minimization standards, as specified. The Assembly amendments additionally require the department, in developing the ADS procurement standard, to consult with the California Privacy Protection Agency, solicit public comment on the ADS procurement standard, and annually review and update the ADS procurement standard and related regulations, as specified. The Assembly amendments instead prohibit, commencing January 1, 2027, a state agency from procuring an ADS, entering into a contract for an ADS, or entering into a contract for any service that utilizes an ADS, as specified, until the department has adopted regulations creating an ADS procurement standard. The Assembly amendments instead authorize, commencing January 1, 2027, a state agency to enter into a contract for an ADS, or a service that utilizes an ADS, only if the department has adopted regulations and only if the contract includes a clause that, among other things, provides a termination right in the event of a significant breach of responsibility or violation by the vendor.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.153S.B.No. 899 —Skinner et al.An act relating to protective orders.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 899, as it passed the Senate, made various changes to the procedures and enforcement of firearm restrictions for specified protective orders.
The Assembly amendments delay the operation of the provisions of the bill until January 1, 2026. The Assembly amendments also revise the relinquishment process for firearms and revise the exemption for when carrying a firearm is necessary as a condition of employment. The Assembly amendments additionally remove legislative findings and incorporate changes proposed by AB 2759 and SB 1002 to be operative only if SB 899 and those bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Vote: 22. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.154S.B.No. 910 —Umberg et al.An act relating to courts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 910, as it passed the Senate, required counties that opt to have treatment court programs to ensure the programs are designed and operated in accordance with the “Adult Treatment Court Best Practice Standards” developed by All Rise (founded as the National Association of Drug Court Professionals). SB 910 specified the Legislature intended that key components of the programs include, among others, integration by treatment courts of behavioral health treatment services with justice system case processing.
The Assembly amendments also include within its provisions courts that opt to have treatment court programs. The Assembly amendments specify the treatment court programs must be designed and operated in accordance with state and national guidelines also incorporating “Family Treatment Court Best Practice Standards” developed by All Rise, and with consideration for the distinct court system within which the program operates. The Assembly amendments specify the Legislature intends to have specified key components in the criminal adult treatment court programs.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.155S.B.No. 926 —Wahab et al.An act relating to crimes.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 926, as it passed the Senate, made it a crime to intentionally create and distribute or cause to be distributed any photo realistic image, digital image, electronic image, computer image, computer-generated image, or other pictorial representation of an intimate body part or parts of another identifiable person, or an image of the person depicted engaged in an act of sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, sexual penetration, or an image of masturbation by the person depicted or in which the person depicted participates that was created in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to believe the image is an authentic image of the person depicted, under circumstances in which the person distributing the image knows or should know that distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress.
The Assembly amendments exempt any person under 18 years of age from that crime and incorporate changes to Section 647 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1874, AB 1962, and SB 1414, to be operative only if this bill and some or all of those other bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.156S.B.No. 958 —Dodd et al.An act relating to state surplus property, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 958, as it passed the Senate, authorized the Director of General Services to sell or exchange specified property located in the County of Napa, known as Camp Coombs, by January 1, 2026, as provided.
The Assembly amendments require that sale or exchange to be separate from the sale or exchange of 850 acres of property located in the County of Napa, as part of the Skyline Wilderness Park, as specified.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.157S.B.No. 997 —Portantino et al.An act relating to pupil health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 997, as it passed the Senate, explicitly authorized school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools to develop and adopt a policy that allows pupils in middle schools, junior high schools, high schools, and adult schools to carry a federally approved naloxone hydrochloride nasal product or any other federally approved opioid antagonist, as provided, for the emergency treatment of persons suffering, or reasonably believed to be suffering, from an opioid overdose and required, for those local educational agencies that choose to develop and adopt a policy pursuant to those provisions, to include, at a minimum, a requirement that a pupil has received instruction in the administration of those products. SB 997, as it passed the Senate, required public middle schools, junior high schools, high schools, and adult schools that are operated by a local educational agency to stock and distribute fentanyl test strips, notify pupils about the presence and location of fentanyl test strips, and allow pupils to carry fentanyl test strips, as provided.
The Assembly amendments delete the contents of the bill and instead prohibit local educational agencies from prohibiting pupils in middle schools, junior high schools, high schools, or adult schools, while on a schoolsite or participating in school activities, from carrying fentanyl test strips or a federally approved opioid antagonist, as provided, for the emergency treatment of persons suffering, or reasonably believed to be suffering, from an opioid overdose.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.158S.B.No. 1019 —Blakespear et al.An act relating to firearms.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1019, as it passed the Senate, required that the destruction of a firearm by a law enforcement agency, when required by law, means destroying the firearm in its entirety by smelting, shredding, crushing, or cutting all parts of the firearm, including any attachments, and also required every law enforcement agency to develop and maintain a written policy regarding the destruction of firearms.
The Assembly amendments exempt from this requirement the destruction of a firearm by another party pursuant to an existing contract, if the new requirements would result in a breach of that contract. The Assembly amendments also exempt from required destruction certain firearms that were stolen or used without the prior knowledge of their lawful owner and that are possessed by a public administrator, public guardian, or public conservator in the performance of their duties as the personal representative of a decedent’s estate, or in the performance of the duties of a conservator or guardian over a person or their estate. Finally, the Assembly amendments also add chaptering amendments with AB 2739 and AB 2842.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.159S.B.No. 1069 —Menjivar.An act relating to state prisons.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1069, as it passed the Senate, gave the Office of the Inspector General investigatory authority over all staff misconduct cases that involve sexual misconduct with an incarcerated person and authorized the office to monitor and investigate a complaint that involves sexual misconduct with an incarcerated person.
The Assembly amendments clarify when the Office of the Inspector General may exercise its investigatory authority and require the office to, upon the completion of an investigation, compile and submit a report to the appropriate hiring authority.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.160S.B.No. 1090 —Durazo et al.An act relating to unemployment insurance.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1090, as it passed the Senate, required the issuance of the initial payment for unemployment compensation disability benefits within 14 days of receipt of the claimant’s properly completed first disability claim or as soon as eligibility begins, whichever is later. SB 1090, as it passed the Senate, applied the same initial payment issuance schedule to the paid family leave program and repealed the requirement that eligible workers receive benefits generally in accordance with unemployment and disability compensation law. SB 1090, as it passed the Senate, made these changes operative when the next scheduled improvement of the Employment Development Department’s integrated claims management system is implemented.
The Assembly amendments instead make these changes operative when these changes are incorporated in the Employment Development Department’s integrated claims management system as part of the EDDNext project.
SB 1090, as it passed the Senate, required the first claim to be filed not earlier than 30 days prior to the first compensable day with respect to which the claim for benefits is made, under the state disability insurance and paid family leave programs. SB 1090, as it passed the Senate, made these changes operative when next scheduled improvement of the Employment Development Department’s integrated claims management system is implemented.
The Assembly amendments instead authorize an individual to initiate the claims process up to 30 days in advance of the anticipated first compensable day. The Assembly amendments make these changes operative when these changes are incorporated in the Employment Development Department’s integrated claims management system as part of the EDDNext project.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.161S.B.No. 1150 —Laird.An act relating to marriage.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1150, as it left the Senate, clarified that, with respect to a proceeding for dissolution or nullity of marriage, the provisions for the restoration of birth name or former name apply to either partner.
The Assembly amendments make a nonsubstantive change to the bill.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.162S.B.No. 1166 —Dodd et al.An act relating to public postsecondary education.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1166, as it passed the Senate, required the California State University and the California Community Colleges, and requested the University of California, on or before December 1, 2026, and on or before each December 1 thereafter, to submit a report to the Legislature that provides a summation of the activities undertaken by each district or campus, as applicable, and by each systemwide Title IX office, to ensure campus programs and activities are free from sex discrimination, as provided.
The Assembly amendments instead require the California Community Colleges to submit the above-described report on or before December 1, 2026, and on or before December 1 every 3 years thereafter. The Assembly amendments also require the California State University, and request the University of California, to present each report during a public meeting of the trustees or regents, as applicable.
SB 1166, as it passed the Senate, required, on or before September 1, 2026, and on or before each September 1 thereafter, the governing board of each community college district to prepare and submit to the chancellor’s office a report on the activities undertaken by each community college district to ensure campus programs and activities are free from sex discrimination, as provided.
The Assembly amendments require each community college district to post those annual reports on its internet website and to present each report during a public meeting of the governing board of the community college district.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.163S.B.No. 1180 —Ashby et al.An act relating to health care coverage.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1180, as it passed the Senate, required a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2025, to establish a process to reimburse for services provided by a community paramedicine program, a triage to alternate destination program, or a mobile integrated health program, and required Medi-Cal coverage of services provided by those programs. SB 1180, as it passed the Senate, required the contract or policy to require an enrollee or insured receiving covered services from a noncontracting program to pay no more than the same cost sharing that they would pay for the same covered services received from a contracting program, and required that reimbursement for the noncontracting program follow the same process as set forth in certain provisions under existing law.
The Assembly amendments, for purposes of health care service plans and health insurers, instead apply the provisions to contracts or policies issued, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2025. The Assembly amendments, instead of specifying a reimbursement process for noncontracting programs, prohibit reimbursement rates from exceeding the plan’s or insurer’s usual and customary charges for services rendered.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—35.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.164S.B.No. 1187 —McGuire.An act relating to housing.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1187, as it passed the Senate, established the Tribal Housing Grant Program Trust Fund, administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (department). SB 1187, as it passed the Senate, required any appropriations through the annual Budget Act for purposes of the fund and any other funding that may be made available to the department for the purposes of the fund from any other source to be paid and deposited in the fund. SB 1187, as it passed the Senate, required the department to allocate funding in the fund using a specified formula, while also authorizing the department to periodically adjust that formula, as provided. SB 1187, as it passed the Senate, provided timeframes within which recipients were required to expend the funds, including requiring recipients to expend all funds allocated to programs and services within 3 years from the date of execution of a funding agreement with the department and to expend all funds allocated to projects within 5 years. SB 1187, as it passed the Senate, specified that the Budget Act include an appropriation for the fund every year from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2029, as specified. SB 1187, as it passed the Senate, specified a definition for the “Tribal equity advisory committee.”
The Assembly amendments require additional sources of funding for the Tribal Housing Grant Program Trust Fund, including 10% of any moneys that will be appropriated and made available by the Legislature to the department through the annual Budget Act for certain housing-related programs. The Assembly amendments also authorize as an additional source of funding for the fund moneys made available to the department through voter-approved bonds that may be made available as tribal set-asides, as specified. The Assembly amendments require the department to monitor the balance of the fund and only make allocations once the department determines there is sufficient funding available. The Assembly amendments make changes to the allocation formula, as specified. The Assembly amendments remove the department’s ability to periodically adjust the allocation formula. The Assembly amendments extend the timeframes within which recipients of funding are required to spend the funds to 5 and 7 years, respectively, as specified. The Assembly amendments remove the specification that the Budget Act include an appropriation for the fund every year from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2029. The Assembly amendments include a modified definition for the “Tribal housing grant program trust fund advisory committee.”
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.165S.B.No. 1197 —Alvarado-Gil et al.An act relating to public social services.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1197, as it passed the Senate, prohibited children who reside with a resource family and who receive both Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program benefits and regional center services from being prohibited from receiving in-home respite services. SB 1197 also prohibited Indian children who receive both AFDC-FC benefits and regional center services and who reside with an extended family member, as defined, or a tribally approved home, as defined, from being prohibited from receiving in-home respite services.
The Assembly amendments require regional centers to assess a small family home for service need, as specified, prior to approving in-home respite services for children in that placement type who receive both AFDC-FC benefits and regional center services.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.166S.B.No. 1213 —Atkins et al.An act relating to health care programs.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1213, as it passed the Senate, provided that an individual is eligible to receive specified cancer treatment services if the individual has a family income at or below 300% of the federal poverty level as determined by the provider performing the screening and diagnosis.
The Assembly amendments, commencing no later than July 1, 2026, provide that an individual is eligible to receive these treatment services if the individual has a family income at or below 250% of the federal poverty level as determined by the provider performing the screening and diagnosis.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.167S.B.No. 1244 —Newman.An act relating to pupil instruction.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1244, as it passed the Senate, authorized a community college district to enter into a College and Career Access Pathways (CCAP) partnership to offer dual enrollment courses with a school district, county office of education, or charter school within the service area of another community college district if the community college district in the service area of the school district, county office of education, or charter school declined a request from the school district, county office of education, or charter school, or failed to take action within 60 calendar days of a request by the school district, county office of education, or charter school to either enter into a CCAP partnership or to approve another community college district to enter into a CCAP partnership to offer those courses.
The Assembly amendments instead require a community college district to allow an existing CCAP partnership to be amended, or a new CCAP agreement to be established with a school district, county office of education, or charter school and a community college district outside of the primary community college district’s service area if the primary community college district has declined a request, or has failed to take action within 60 calendar days of a request, to either amend into the existing CCAP partnership the requested courses, or to approve another community college district to enter into a CCAP partnership to offer those courses.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.168S.B.No. 1246 —Limón et al.An act relating to state government administration.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1246, as it passed the Senate, defined the term “grant” in the context of the California Prompt Payment Act, to, in addition to a signed final agreement between any state agency and a local government agency or organization authorized to accept grant funding for victim services or prevention programs administered by any state agency, or restoration activities performed by a resource conservation district, mean a signed final agreement between any state agency and a nonprofit organization, and deleted an exception from certain penalty provisions under the act if a grant or contract was awarded to a nonprofit organization in an amount less than $500,000. SB 1246, as it passed the Senate, required, if a state agency disputes an invoice received from a nonprofit organization claimant, the state agency to pay the undisputed portion of the invoice, as specified.
The Assembly amendments, instead of changing the definition of the term “grant,” delete the definition of the term “grant” from the act and provide that only specified late payment penalties apply to a signed final agreement for a grant by any state agency to a local government agency or organization authorized to accept grant funding for victim services or prevention programs administered by any state agency, a grant to a resource conservation district for restoration activities, or a grant by any state agency to a nonprofit organization. The Assembly amendments also delete the provisions of the bill related to disputed invoices.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.169S.B.No. 1371 —Bradford.An act relating to alcoholic beverages.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1371, as it passed the Senate, makes reliance upon a system that reviews bona fide evidence of majority and biometrics to determine the age and identity of a person before admittance into a premises where alcoholic beverages may be lawfully purchased a defense to any criminal prosecution or proceedings against the holder of a license to sell alcoholic beverages.
The Assembly amendments clarify that the utilization of a biometric system is a defense to any criminal prosecution or proceedings against the licensee and require that system to be based upon a review of bona fide evidence of majority and identity of a person and that verifies and authenticates the validity of that bona fide evidence.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.170S.B.No. 1391 —Rubio et al.An act relating to teachers.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1391, as it passed the Senate, among other things, required the Office of Cradle-to-Career Data, as the managing entity of the California Cradle-to-Career Data System, and under the direction of the data system’s governing board, to create a teacher training and retention dashboard within the data system on or before January 1, 2026, and required the dashboard to provide certain information on California’s teacher workforce, including, among other things, trends regarding participation in programs for addressing teacher shortages and teacher diversity, including certain specified programs, as appropriate. SB 1391, as it passed the Senate, required that data to address specified topics for that trend, including, among others, the percentage of program participants who complete a teacher preparation program and earn a preliminary teaching credential.
The Assembly amendments (1) require all specified data topics on that trend to be disaggregated by race and ethnicity, (2) require the data topics to also include the number of program participants who complete a teacher preparation program and earn a preliminary teaching credential, and (3) require both the number and the percentage of those participants to be additionally disaggregated by cohort. The Assembly amendments also make nonsubstantive changes to apply other provisions of the bill to the latest amended form of law, make changes to the related legislative findings and declarations, add a coauthor, and make nonsubstantive changes to address possible chaptering conflicts with AB 176 and SB 176.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.171S.B.No. 1411 —Ochoa Bogh.An act relating to curriculum.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1411, as it passed the Senate, added 6 public members, appointed by the Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates, to the Instructional Quality Commission and required the committee to ensure that its appointments include 2 faculty subject matter experts each from the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California.
The Assembly amendments delete the contents of the bill, and, instead, require the commission, when it revises a curriculum framework in mathematics or science, to ensure that the associated curriculum framework and evaluation criteria committee includes representation from higher education faculty with relevant subject matter expertise. The Assembly amendments authorize the Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates to nominate 2 faculty from California public institutions of higher education for consideration to serve on the relevant curriculum framework and evaluation criteria committee for these purposes. The Assembly amendments also include nonsubstantive changes to address possible chaptering conflicts with SB 1412.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.172S.B.No. 1412 —Ochoa Bogh.An act relating to curriculum.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1412, as it passed the Senate, prohibited publishers, distributors, and retailers of instructional materials or professional development materials, and their representatives, from being eligible for appointment to the Instructional Quality Commission or selected to serve on any committee, subcommittee, or working group of the commission, as provided.
The Assembly amendments instead prohibit a curriculum vendor, as defined, from being appointed to a curriculum framework and evaluation criteria committee of the commission or from being selected to serve as a member of the writing team, as defined. The Assembly amendments also include nonsubstantive changes to address possible chaptering conflicts with SB 1411.
SB 1412, as it passed the Senate, prohibited communications between (1) publishers, distributors, and retailers of instructional materials or professional development materials, and their representatives, and (2) members of the commission, facilitators, instructional materials reviewers, or content review experts, during their tenure, except as specifically authorized, and, if there is a prohibited communication, authorized the State Board of Education to take corrective action, as provided.
The Assembly amendments, in a similar manner as SB 1412 passed the Senate, instead prohibit communications between curriculum vendors and members of the commission or the writing team, during their tenure, except as specifically authorized, and, if there is a prohibited communication, authorize the state board to take corrective action, as provided.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.173S.B.No. 1415 —Glazer et al.An act relating to CalWORKs.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1415, as it passed the Senate, among other things, clarified that the existing payment of $175 to $500 per semester or quarter to a CalWORKs eligible individual who is participating full time or part time in an educational activity at a publicly funded or nonprofit postsecondary educational institution, as specified, for the purpose of paying costs associated with attending that institution, is considered a standard payment for computers, along with books and other college supplies. SB 1415, as it passed the Senate, beginning January 1, 2026, or when specified automation processes are available, upon application for temporary or permanent homeless assistance under specific provisions of the CalWORKs program, required the county to refer the assistance unit to any other homeless assistance services provided under the CalWORKs program, and authorized the county to give priority to the assistance unit for those services.
The Assembly amendments remove the above-described provisions from the bill.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.174S.B.No. 1443 —Jones.An act relating to homelessness.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1443, as it passed the Senate, added a representative from the State Council on Developmental Disabilities as a member of the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.
The Assembly amendments make nonsubstantive double-jointing amendments.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.175S.B.No. 1453 —Ashby et al.An act relating to healing arts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1453, as it passed the Senate, made changes to numerous sections of the Business and Professions Code affecting the practice of dentistry. Among other things, SB 1453, as it passed the Senate, revised the conditions under which the Dental Board of California may grant a license to an applicant who has not taken an examination to require that the applicant submit, among other things, proof of a current and unrestricted license issued by a state, district, or territory of the United States to practice dentistry, as specified. SB 1453, as it passed the Senate, authorized the board to issue an elective facial cosmetic surgery permit for specified categories of procedures. AB 1453, as it passed the Senate, among other changes, revised the requirements and conditions of supervision of dental assistants by employers and licensed dentists, training and education requirements for dental assistants, and the functions and duties a dental assistant is authorized to perform.
The Assembly amendments make substantial revisions by making additional changes to the provisions in the bill passed by the Senate and amending additional sections of the Business and Professions Code affecting the practice of dentistry. Among other things, the Assembly amendments additionally authorize the issuance of a license to an applicant who has not taken an examination before the board if the applicant submits proof that the applicant has been engaged in full-time nonclinical practice requiring an active dentist’s license for public health programs in another state, district, or territory of the United States for at least 5 years preceding the application. The Assembly amendments require that a dentist possess a current license and an elective facial cosmetic surgery permit to perform elective facial cosmetic surgery, as provided, and require the board to appoint a committee to review the qualifications of each permit applicant, as provided. The Assembly amendments make further revisions to the above-described provisions governing dental auxiliaries. The Assembly amendments also extend the repeal date of the Dental Board of California from January 1, 2025, to January 1, 2029, and require that the board include, among other specified members, 2 registered dental assistants, rather than 1 registered dental assistant and 1 registered dental hygienist. The Assembly amendments specify courses in certain subjects that would count as continuing education in courses in the actual delivery of dental services to the patient or the community. The Assembly amendments, for purposes of provisions establishing a civil penalty for failure or refusal to comply with a request for a patient’s dental records, provide that the request may be accompanied by the written authorization of the patient or the patient’s representative, as specified. The Assembly amendments authorize the board to post an administrative citation issued pursuant to specified law on its internet website for specified offenses and authorize the board to issue a citation if the board has probable cause to believe that a person, company, or association is advertising with respect to the offering or provision of an educational program or course that requires board approval without being properly approved by the board to offer or provide the educational program or course, as provided.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.176S.B.No. 1455 —Ashby.An act relating to professions and vocations, and making an appropriation therefor.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1455, as it passed the Senate, among other things, continued into existence the Contractors State License Board until January 1, 2029, expanded the definition of “person” under the Contractors State License Law to include a federally recognized tribe, as defined, made contractor’s licenses issuable to federally recognized tribes, as specified, exempted from the Contractors State License Law an authorized representative of a federally recognized tribe, as specified, and exempted federally recognized tribes and federally recognized tribes’ businesses that are chartered under tribal or federal law from certain suspension, notice, reinstatement, and liability provisions.
The Assembly amendments, among other things, require the board to license a federally recognized tribe that applies for licensure and is otherwise compliant with the Contractors State License Law, and define “participating tribe” for purposes of the Contractors State License Law as a federally recognized tribe that formally applies for licensure from the board, as specified. The Assembly amendments require a tribal business to provide verification of its status as a tribal business, as specified. The Assembly amendments prohibit certain bond requirements from applying to a federally recognized tribe or a participating tribe, and extend a requirement regarding cancellation of a corporate license under certain conditions to a participating tribe.
The Assembly amendments additionally require a corporation or limited liability company seeking licensure under the Contractors State License Law to provide its identification number issued by the Secretary of State.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.177S.B.No. 1465 —Archuleta et al.An act relating to housing.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1465, as it passed the Senate, prohibited an enforcement agency from commencing court abatement proceedings for repair of an illegally occupied substandard building if certain conditions were met, including if the owner filed and is diligently prosecuting an unlawful detainer action against the occupant.
The Assembly amendments revise this conditions to be if the owner filed and is diligently prosecuting an unlawful detainer action against the occupant, or if the occupant is being removed pursuant to a specified provision of law relating to trespass.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.178S.B.No. 1471 —Stern et al.An act relating to pupil instruction.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1471, as it passed the Senate, authorized a certificated employee at a public school to conduct a brief period of quiet reflection, with the participation of pupils in attendance, for not more than 60 seconds at the beginning of each schoolday. SB 1471, as it passed the Senate, prohibited a certificated employee from requiring a pupil to participate in the period of quiet reflection. SB 1471, as it passed the Senate, made related legislative findings and declarations.
The Assembly amendments expand the authorization to conduct a period of quiet reflection to any employee at a public school and remove the requirement that the period of quiet reflection not exceed 60 seconds. The Assembly amendments additionally prohibit a classified employee, a guest speaker, or a contractor of the local educational agency from requiring a pupil to participate in the period of quiet reflection. The Assembly amendments, among other things, also revise the legislative findings and declarations.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.179S.B.No. 1527 —Committee on Revenue and Taxation (Senators Glazer (Chair)) et al.An act relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1527, as it passed the Senate, extended a statutory authorization for a county board of spervisors to exemption up to $50,000 of property in the case of possessory interests with lien dates occurring before January 1, 2025, to instead apply to those possessory interests with lien dates occurring before January 1, 2030.
The Assembly amends added additional language required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 28In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.




